The Dangers of the Dark Triadic Rule

The Rule of 3 is a powerful tool in rhetoric and messaging because it aligns with how our brains are wired to process information. It's succinct, memorable, and often effective in persuasive communication. However, its application needs to be judicious and context-dependent. Here's a nuanced take on when to use it and when to break away from it to improve communication and critical thinking.

Executive Summary

In leveraging the understanding that our tendency to distribute attention equally or to use the Rule of 3 stems from a blend of psychological comfort, cultural conditioning, and strategic communication principles, we recognize the power of breaking away from this pattern.

This break can lead to more nuanced, impactful, and authentic communication.

Furthermore, recognizing this pattern allows us to use it as a strategic pattern interrupt in a world saturated with listicles and triadic structures.

Also, when the objective is to foster critical thinking or detailed analysis, relying solely on the Rule of Three may oversimplify the complexities of a topic.

When to Break the Rule of 3

Have you noticed that every important slide usually has exactly 3 points?

Or every sub-heading has exactly 3 bullet points making a statement each?

I find it very suspicious. Don’t you?

In no universe the answer can always be 3 equally important points.

Unless you learned at McKinsey that enumerating your answer makes you sound smart…

“Three key points, three strategic pillars, three innovative solutions,” they chant, as if the complexities of the business world can be tamed into submission by this numerical sorcery.

In a universe brimming with infinite possibilities, why are we boxing our brightest ideas into a trio of bullet points?

There is a reason and it is called The Dark Rule of 3.

But can we let a satisficing numbering phenomenon influence us getting mediocre answers to the understanding of our world?

Answers focused on balanced-by-discrete-equality instead of weighted importance?

No!

Because as human beings we strive for an understanding of the opinionated world when it comes to those things we care about. Not a reality in some artificial equilibrium.

But since the Rule of 3 is a principle deeply rooted in psychology and human cognition – and suggests that things presented in threes are inherently more satisfying and effective than other numbers – we have to fight it actively.

Cognitive efficiency theory and productivity makes it even harder to go against it.

In the context of cognitive efficiency, it reflects the optimal use of mental resources to achieve learning and problem-solving goals.

In the context of productivity, the Rule of 3 emphasizes that breaking tasks or concepts into three distinct components can make them more manageable, memorable, and actionable.

Furthermore it is believed to enhance memorability, storytelling, improve communication and rhetoric, contribute to visual and narrative aesthetics.

Therefore, we come across the Rule of 3 in every possible domain from business, education, communication, to personal development.

Our earlier observations are not wrong, they are designed to adhere to a blend of communication strategy and psychological inclinations.

However, overreliance on the rule of three can lead to potential rigidity, oversimplification, and subjectivity.

Let’s understand our tendency to present information in groups of three, or to evenly distribute attention across different elements:

Why we Love the Rule of 3 and Where we find its Tranquility

When to Use the Rule of Three

Simplifying Complex Information

When the goal is to make complex information accessible and memorable to your audience.

The Rule of Three can help distill the essence of your message, making it easier for the audience to grasp and retain.

Storytelling and Engagement

In storytelling, three acts or components (beginning, middle, end) provide a structure that's easy for audiences to follow.

This can enhance engagement and emotional connection.

Creating Impact in Presentations

In speeches or presentations, grouping information in threes can create a rhythm and emphasis that enhances the impact of your message.

It's useful for highlighting key points or benefits.

And this is why it is so dangerous:

Effectiveness and Memorability: The Rule of 3 in Communication

The Rule of 3 is a well-known principle in communication, suggesting that information presented in threes is more memorable and engaging.

This is not exclusive to consulting firms like McKinsey but is a widespread technique used in storytelling, speeches, and marketing. It's believed that the human brain is predisposed to remember and enjoy patterns, especially simple ones, and three is the smallest number that forms a pattern.

Psychological Comfort: Perceived Balance and Completeness

There's a psychological aspect to preferring things in balanced and complete sets.

Three points can feel comprehensive yet not overwhelming, offering a sense of completeness without oversimplification or excessive detail.

This perceived balance might be more about cognitive ease and aesthetic pleasure than an actual measure of importance or equality.

Educational and Cultural Conditioning

The education system and professional training often emphasize structured approaches to argumentation and presentation.

The "three-point method" is taught as a way to organize thoughts clearly and persuasively.

Additionally, cultural narratives, from fairy tales to classic rhetoric, often use triadic structures, which could condition us to favor and replicate this pattern.

Strategic Simplification for Clarity and Impact

In complex fields like consulting, where information overload is common, simplifying information into three key points can be a strategic choice to ensure clarity and impact.

It's a way to prioritize and highlight what's most important, making it easier for the audience to grasp the essence of the message.

This doesn't necessarily mean that it is important or should be a priority but from the need to communicate effectively in a high-stakes environment.

The Illusion of Equality: Equal Distribution as Fairness

Presenting information in equal parts can create an illusion of fairness and thoroughness, suggesting that all points are of equal weight and deserve equal consideration.

This might reflect an unconscious bias towards equity and balance, which can be reassuring to an audience, even if, in reality, some points may be more critical than others.

When to Break the Rule of 3

Our tendency to distribute attention equally or to use the Rule of 3 might stem from a blend of psychological comfort, cultural conditioning, and strategic communication principles, we must to recognize when breaking away from this pattern could lead to more nuanced, impactful, and authentic communication.

Adapting the structure to fit the content's complexity and the audience's needs can often convey a deeper understanding and appreciation of the subject matter, moving beyond the superficiality of imposed equality.

And we can use it strategically as a pattern interrupt!

Avoiding Formulaic Communication: Repeated use of the Rule of Three can become predictable and may dilute the perceived authenticity or creativity of your message. Breaking away from it can refresh your communication style and make your message stand out.

Communication Design: Breaking it for Pattern Interruption

In a world where everything is digested into listicles and packages of 3, we can agitate and use discomfort to our advantage.

This approach not only grabs attention but also fosters deeper engagement and reflection, challenging audiences to think beyond the conventional and expected.

• The Role of Discomfort in Engagement: Discomfort, when used judiciously, can be a powerful tool for engagement. It prompts audiences to question assumptions, engage more deeply with the content, and remember the message maybe not as effective but longer because it disrupts their cognitive autopilot.
• Guidelines for Strategic Use of Pattern Interrupts: Effectively using pattern interrupts without alienating the audience could involve balancing novelty with relevance, ensuring that the core message is not lost in the attempt to stand out, and using data or feedback to refine the approach.
• Consider Audience and Context: we cannot emphasize enough the importance of understanding the audience and the context in which the communication occurs. A pattern interrupt that works well for one demographic or in one medium might not translate effectively to another. Yes, you need strategic thinking and customization.
• The Importance of Authenticity: Don’t ya’ be using pattern interrupts as a gimmick! The most effective communication strategies are those that are authentic and aligned with the message and values of your brand or yourself. Authenticity ensures that any disruption to the pattern is perceived as thoughtful and intentional, rather than as a mere attention-grabbing tactic.

By embracing the strategic use of pattern interrupts, we can create more engaging, memorable, and impactful communication. Because repeated use of any rule can become predictable and may dilute the perceived authenticity or creativity of your message.

Breaking away from it can refresh your communication style and make your message stand out.

Breaking it for Critical Thinking

The Rule of Three is because it aligns with how our brains are wired to process information. However, its application needs to be judicious and context-dependent.

When to Break the Rule of Three:

1. Encouraging Deep Analysis and Critical Thinking: When the objective is to foster critical thinking or detailed analysis, relying solely on the Rule of Three may oversimplify the complexities of a topic. This is where breaking the pattern can encourage a deeper dive into the nuances and subtleties that would otherwise be overlooked.
2. Addressing Complex Realities: Real-world issues often can't be neatly packaged into three points. Recognizing and presenting the multifaceted nature of these issues can provide a more accurate and comprehensive understanding, which is crucial for informed decision-making.

Navigating the Decision

So whether it is for critical thinking or for avoiding formulaic communication understanding when and how to apply or deviate from the Rule of 3 is a skill that enhances both the effectiveness of communication and the depth of engagement with your audience.

Consider the context, objectives, and the complexities of the subject matter, so you can ensure that your communication is both impactful and reflective of the nuanced realities it seeks to convey.

Especially consider

• Audience and Purpose Alignment. This should guide whether a simplified approach or a more complex, nuanced one is appropriate. The needs and expectations of your audience, and what you aim to achieve with your communication.
• Balance and Flexibility: It's about finding the right balance between simplicity and complexity, without sacrificing the depth or accuracy needed for comprehensive understanding.
• Strategic Disruption: Use pattern interrupts thoughtfully to challenge expectations and engage your audience in a more profound exploration of the topic. This can be especially effective in environments where critical thinking and in-depth analysis are valued.

It's all about moving beyond the safety of familiar structures to explore the potential of what lies outside conventional boundaries, thereby enriching our interactions and the messages we share.

Application in Prompting Engineering

Have you noticed that every multi-part answer ChatGPT provides usually has exactly 3 points?

Like every heading has exactly 3 bullet points making a statement each?

I find it very suspicious. Don’t you?

Find out how to engineer your prompt to get answerers from generative AI that are focused on weighted importance, and not focused on providing a balanced-by-discrete-equality overview?